Fundraiser Sleeping Rough for 31 Days Shares Publicity Tips
For James Beavis, a medical student raising
money for homelessness charity Crisis by sleeping rough on the streets of
London for 31 days this Christmas, social media is a vital tool in reaching
out to potential donors. I met James for an interview last week, to find
out more about the campaign, and to hear about the ways in which he’s used
sites like Facebook to raise over £15,000 in the space of two weeks. Having undertaken a similar project in 2012 over the course of eight days, James ultimately says that things have changed a lot with regards fundraising on social media.
So, James, you’re on a lot of social media platforms; Snapchat, Facebook, Twitter. Which is the best for your campaign?
Facebook. Facebook’s the best, although there’s a big debate
between Facebook or YouTube. Facebook is good for starting a small campaign, for getting something started. But then it’s quite often good to move to YouTube once you’ve got your viewership. Facebook’s really good for
starting something because you’ve got so many options to 'like', because you
appear on people’s news feeds; whereas YouTube is really good for getting on
things like Reddit, which is where something explodes.
Last time, I did the majority of the campaign on YouTube,
and it did get on things like Reddit. But honestly, I’m sticking with my guns
and sticking to Facebook, just because I know I’ve got a followership. If I was
to do it again, I’d probably start on YouTube, but I want everything in one
place, so people can watch [the videos]...I’m no good at video editing, I’m learning it.
Have you got software?
I’ve got iMovie. I know how to use it and I’m a
technophobe.
How are you finding Snapchat compares?
Snapchat’s been good as well because people sit there and
they go “boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom” and I go “Jeez”.
It’s in their pocket and it’s there and—whereas with
Facebook, where they have to seek [the campaign] out, Snapchat goes to them. That’s the
biggest difference. Snapchat, it’s in their inbox whereas Facebook they
have to go and seek it out.
It keeps people repeatedly engaged...touch wood...in fact, I was worried about it going down. In one of the
videos, it was down four [thousand views] and in the last one it went up
four [thousand]…and this is one of the issues. You want to up your engagement...[but] it’s so difficult. You want constant
new material; but there isn’t constant new material. My days are actually very
mundane. You want to see me - it sounds bad - but you want to see me with a
black eye or something.
The use of hashtags; sharing Facebook posts; inviting people to
join the group: which do you think is the most important, helpful and effective?
Inviting people to join the group, because then I’ve got a
one-way connection with them, and I can get to them rather than having to go
through someone else. By having that connection...I get access to that person, I can access them directly, rather than
having to access that person’s network by virtue of another network.
Last time, I did an 'event' [on Facebook]. But Facebook has changed. Last
time, the event had something like 120,000 people invited. That’s viral, I’d say, arguably. But, the thing was that Facebook, you
used to be able to use codes and you used to be able to hack Facebook if you
used Java script. Now, Facebook has changed it and it’s so difficult to do.
We’re almost there, but the thing is, you can’t invite that many people to an
event. The max is 200 in a certain time.
Could you not just invite a big group of people to the
event and then invite a load more people again?
I could do, but that would take a lot of time. I’d have to
go around on my phone and click everyone. And this is what I’m keen for you to
do and what I’m really keen for people to just—it takes less than a minute to
click 60 times; but if you just click through that list with your 60
most-talked-to people, they’re the 60 people who are most likely to engage with
something that you do on your account.
Would you say it’s something of a hybrid, then, between social media
and word of mouth? It’s not that you can simply set up a Facebook page
and let it run itself; you’ve got to have people who know people.
Yep. I can show you the stats if you like.
Please do.
So, we’ve got 2,426 likes which is good in one way, but is sort of
disappointing in another. I’ve got about 4,000 Facebook friends, so it’s a little bit disappointing because you’d like every one of your friends to
like this.
Insights…when I last did it, this wasn’t so monetarised. And
also, last time, Facebook, you know it puts [limits] on how much you hear on
other people’s newsfeeds now? They didn’t used to do that, as far as I know. It used to be click-based. Which it still is, to a certain
extent.
So there are certain algorithms that are getting in the way
of your exposure.
And that’s once it’s for charity. They’re trying to charge
me. They own the platform, I get it, and thaey’re a business; but if they took way that [obstacle] for charities...[charities] would be able to exploit the platform so much
more to promote the cause.
Is social media as reliable as the old fashioned methods of
text messages and so forth?
There's two sides to that.
Yes, because you get 'seen' notifications; people have more pressure to reply...If you're asking someone to do something personally, you can see they've seen it; and they can see that you've seen that. Which is useful, especially when you're asking someone to do something which they can't be bothered to do.
No, because social media curtails your viewership. With text messages, if I send a thousand texts to people, a thousand texts will come to them. If I put out a status that should come to four thousand friends, five hundred will see it.
But social media is free.
Text messages are free. There are unlimited texts on pretty much every contract.
Modern day social media is a blessing and a plague. It's a blessing in as much as it does let you reach a lot of people very quickly, it's easy. But it's a plague because it charges you when you want it not to...Social media four years ago was such a different creature.
There are three things:
The first one, just like the social media pages. By
liking the pages, you keep up-to-date and you know exactly what’s going on,
which enables you to take more action.
Second thing is sharing; sharing the videos. I’ve got a network,
a reasonably big network; but if I can utilise other people’s networks - even
if you’re not going to donate yourself, you’re sharing your network…So far, we’ve
had, across all the videos, around a thousand shares. We’ve raised £6000. That
means each time someone’s clicked 'share', that’s been worth around six pounds on
average to the homelessness charity. Just by clicking share. That’s enabled
maybe three or four people to have a meal on Christmas day. That’s incredible.
Third thing they can do, probably the most important thing,
is donate. By donating they’re actually being part of the solution directly.
They’re not taking chances, they can quantify the difference that they’re going
to make. And that will make a difference.
Finally, solidarity. You're getting a lot of support and solidarity messages on social media. Does it help?
It's frustrating rather than helpful. Quite often, you get messages saying the words “inspirational”
and “hero”…but it’s actually quite upsetting. It's upsetting because people do this every
single day; and the people who are the real heroes are the people who are
actually out there doing it...People take the time to say it to me because I'm white middle-class.
I've got
about 250 donators, yesterday we started receiving some new corporate donations
like we had yesterday Thermal workwear clothing company FlexiTog and Cambridge based Digital Marketing
Agency The SMF Group .
FlexiTog has donated 10% of their sells on the 21st of this month and The SMF Group has matched FlexiTog’s donation plus has offered to support us running a campaign on their social media and Social Ads. I've definitely had as well more than 250 people sending solidarity messages...I need them to donate.
FlexiTog has donated 10% of their sells on the 21st of this month and The SMF Group has matched FlexiTog’s donation plus has offered to support us running a campaign on their social media and Social Ads. I've definitely had as well more than 250 people sending solidarity messages...I need them to donate.
To support James' fundraising efforts, you can donate to
Crisis via the project’s page, here.
You can follow James’ progress on Facebook, here.
And you can use the hashtag #Homelessatxmas
or follow James’ activities on Twitter, here.
James has a Bachelor’s degree in History and wrote his dissertation on beef and protest. His heroes list ranges from Adele to Noam Chomsky: inspirations he’ll be invoking next year when he begins a Master’s degree in London. Follow him @Songbird_James
Contact us on Twitter, on Facebook, or leave your comments below. To find out about social media training or management why not take a look at our website for more info: TheSMFGroup.com
Fundraiser Sleeping Rough for 31 Days Shares Publicity Tips
Reviewed by Unknown
on
Friday, December 23, 2016
Rating: